Dates/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman–Volscian wars - Revision history

Karen at 02:02, 1 October 2023

2023-10-01T02:02:43Z

Karen at 19:16, 10 September 2023

2023-09-10T19:16:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 10 September 2023
Line 24:		Line 24:
	the Latins 383–381\nAncient narrat;381;bc-y;;;;		the Latins 383–381\nAncient narrat;381;bc-y;;;;
	ecords that in 383 Lanuvium, a La;383;bc-y;;;;		ecords that in 383 Lanuvium, a La;383;bc-y;;;;
	peace.[52] In 382 consular tribu;382;bc-y;;;;		peace.[00] In 382 consular tribu;382;bc-y;;;;
	narratives for 381. In that year ;381;bc-y;;;;		narratives for 381. In that year ;381;bc-y;;;;
	he campaign of 382 are plausible,;382;bc-y;;;;		he campaign of 382 are plausible,;382;bc-y;;;;
Line 31:		Line 31:
	f Satricum 380–377\nAncient narrat;377;bc-y;;;;		f Satricum 380–377\nAncient narrat;377;bc-y;;;;
	eports that in 380 the Romans sto;380;bc-y;;;;		eports that in 380 the Romans sto;380;bc-y;;;;
	peace.[60] In 379 the Romans ass;379;bc-y;;;;		peace.[00] In 379 the Romans ass;379;bc-y;;;;
	The next year, 378, the Volsci in;378;bc-y;;;;		The next year, 378, the Volsci in;378;bc-y;;;;
	ing to Livy in 377 the Volsci and;377;bc-y;;;;		ing to Livy in 377 the Volsci and;377;bc-y;;;;
Line 43:		Line 43:
	the burning in 377 a retrojection;377;bc-y;;;;		the burning in 377 a retrojection;377;bc-y;;;;
	the events of 346. Oakley (1997);346;bc-y;;;;		the events of 346. Oakley (1997);346;bc-y;;;;
	ptured both in 377 and 346.[48] L;377;bc-y;;;;		ptured both in 377 and 346.[00] L;377;bc-y;;;;
	oth in 377 and 346.[48] Livy reco;346;bc-y;;;;		oth in 377 and 346.[00] Livy reco;346;bc-y;;;;
	the Volsci in 348, but this is u;348;bc-y;;;;		the Volsci in 348, but this is u;348;bc-y;;;;
	ainst Velitrae 370–367\nAccording ;370;bc-y;;;;		ainst Velitrae 370–367\nAccording ;370;bc-y;;;;
Line 55:		Line 55:
	he decision in 367 to replace the;367;bc-y;;;;		he decision in 367 to replace the;367;bc-y;;;;
	writes that in 370 the Velitraean;370;bc-y;;;;		writes that in 370 the Velitraean;370;bc-y;;;;
	man success in 367.[72] According;367;bc-y;;;;		man success in 367.[00] According;367;bc-y;;;;
	fifth time in 367, without a str;367;bc-y;;;;		fifth time in 367, without a str;367;bc-y;;;;
	avaged Rome in 365.\n\nModern inter;365;bc-y;;;;		avaged Rome in 365.\n\nModern inter;365;bc-y;;;;
	and Rome until 357.[74]\n\nSporadic;357;bc-y;;;;		and Rome until 357.[00]\n\nSporadic;357;bc-y;;;;
	with Privernum 358–357\nIn 358 the;358;bc-y;;1.1.2.1;;		with Privernum 358–357\nIn 358 the;358;bc-y;;1.1.2.1;;
	Privernum 358–357\nIn 358 the Rom;357;bc-y;;;;		Privernum 358–357\nIn 358 the Rom;357;bc-y;;;;
Line 66:		Line 66:
	account of the 350s suggest that t;350s;bc-d;;;;		account of the 350s suggest that t;350s;bc-d;;;;
	on of Satricum 346\nLivy states th;346;bc-y;;;;		on of Satricum 346\nLivy states th;346;bc-y;;;;
	lt Satricum in 348.[83] Then in 3;348;bc-y;;;;		lt Satricum in 348.[00] Then in 3;348;bc-y;;;;
	8.[83] Then in 346 news reached R;346;bc-y;;;;		8.[00] Then in 346 news reached R;346;bc-y;;;;
	of Satricum in 377 and 346, both ;377;bc-y;;;;		of Satricum in 377 and 346, both ;377;bc-y;;;;
	cum in 377 and 346, both times on;346;bc-y;;;;		cum in 377 and 346, both times on;346;bc-y;;;;
	rebuilding in 348 is more likely;348;bc-y;;;;		rebuilding in 348 is more likely;348;bc-y;;;;
	after the mid-fourth century.[87] H;fourth;bc-c;;;;		after the mid-fourth century.[00] H;fourth;bc-c;;;;
	ptured both in 377 and 346.[86] T;377;bc-y;;;;		ptured both in 377 and 346.[00] T;377;bc-y;;;;
	oth in 377 and 346.[86] The claim;346;bc-y;;;;		oth in 377 and 346.[00] The claim;346;bc-y;;;;
	apture of Sora 345\nLivy notes tha;345;bc-y;;;;		apture of Sora 345\nLivy notes tha;345;bc-y;;;;
	the consuls of 345 took Sora, loc;345;bc-y;;;;		the consuls of 345 took Sora, loc;345;bc-y;;;;
Line 79:		Line 79:
	l of Sora from 345 to 315. The ne;345;bc-y;;;;		l of Sora from 345 to 315. The ne;345;bc-y;;;;
	ra from 345 to 315. The next reco;315;bc-y;;;;		ra from 345 to 315. The next reco;315;bc-y;;;;
	took place in 329.[90]\n\nWars wit;329;bc-y;;;;		took place in 329.[00]\n\nWars wit;329;bc-y;;;;
	num and Antium 341\nIn 343 the Fir;341;bc-y;;;;		num and Antium 341\nIn 343 the Fir;341;bc-y;;;;
	Antium 341\nIn 343 the First Samn;343;bc-y;;;;		Antium 341\nIn 343 the First Samn;343;bc-y;;;;
Line 89:		Line 89:
	the census of 318 rather than in;318;bc-y;;;;		the census of 318 rather than in;318;bc-y;;;;
	the census of 332. It is however;332;bc-y;;;;		the census of 332. It is however;332;bc-y;;;;
	gainst Rome in 341.[93]\n\nRoman su;341;bc-y;;;;		gainst Rome in 341.[00]\n\nRoman su;341;bc-y;;;;
	the Latin War, 340–338, but Rome ;340;bc-y;;;;		the Latin War, 340–338, but Rome ;340;bc-y;;;;
	Latin War, 340–338, but Rome was ;338;bc-y;;;;		Latin War, 340–338, but Rome was ;338;bc-y;;;;
Line 96:		Line 96:
	[[Category:Pages with dates]]		[[Category:Pages with dates]]
	[[Category:en.wikipedia.org]]		[[Category:en.wikipedia.org]]
			[[Category:Format version 2]]

Karen: initial commit

2023-08-12T12:03:59Z

initial commit

New page

<poem><nowiki>
ith the Latins 383–381\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;383;bc-y;;;;
the Latins 383–381\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;381;bc-y;;;;
on of Satricum 380–377\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;380;bc-y;;;;
f Satricum 380–377\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;377;bc-y;;;;
ainst Velitrae 370–367\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;370;bc-y;;;;
t Velitrae 370–367\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;367;bc-y;;;;
with Privernum 358–357\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;358;bc-y;;;;
Privernum 358–357\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;357;bc-y;;;;
on of Satricum 346\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;346;bc-y;;;;
apture of Sora 345\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;345;bc-y;;;;
num and Antium 341\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t;341;bc-y;;;;
sci during the 380s and 370s BC.\n\n;380s;bc-d;;;;
g the 380s and 370s BC.\n\nAncient narr;370s BC;bc-d;;;;
ing to him, in 388 the Roman trib;388;bc-y;;;;
s' campaign of 386 as a doublet o;386;bc-y;;;;
let of that of 389 (itself invent;389;bc-y;;;;
the events of 385 as they depend;385;bc-y;;;;
ian tribune of 388, L. Sicinius, ;388;bc-y;;;;
the Latins in 393 and 401 respec;393;bc-y;;;;
ins in 393 and 401 respectively, ;401;bc-y;;;;
garrisons. By 385 the native Vol;385;bc-y;;;;
ith the Latins 383–381\nAncient na;383;bc-y;;;;
the Latins 383–381\nAncient narrat;381;bc-y;;;;
ecords that in 383 Lanuvium, a La;383;bc-y;;;;
peace.[52] In 382 consular tribu;382;bc-y;;;;
narratives for 381. In that year ;381;bc-y;;;;
he campaign of 382 are plausible,;382;bc-y;;;;
at Satricum in 381, Plutarch's is;381;bc-y;;;;
on of Satricum 380–377\nAncient na;380;bc-y;;;;
f Satricum 380–377\nAncient narrat;377;bc-y;;;;
eports that in 380 the Romans sto;380;bc-y;;;;
peace.[60] In 379 the Romans ass;379;bc-y;;;;
The next year, 378, the Volsci in;378;bc-y;;;;
ing to Livy in 377 the Volsci and;377;bc-y;;;;
the Volsci in 386) and Lucius Ae;386;bc-y;;;;
oman defeat in 379, is a common t;379;bc-y;;;;
eatment of the 378 campaign sugge;378;bc-y;;;;
an wars of the 5th century, Ecetr;5th;bc-c;;;;
ter Matuta, in 346, this time by ;346;bc-y;;;;
of Satricum in 377 and 346 is a d;377;bc-y;;;;
cum in 377 and 346 is a doublet. ;346;bc-y;;;;
the burning in 377 a retrojection;377;bc-y;;;;
the events of 346. Oakley (1997);346;bc-y;;;;
ptured both in 377 and 346.[48] L;377;bc-y;;;;
oth in 377 and 346.[48] Livy reco;346;bc-y;;;;
the Volsci in 348, but this is u;348;bc-y;;;;
ainst Velitrae 370–367\nAccording ;370;bc-y;;;;
t Velitrae 370–367\nAccording to t;367;bc-y;;;;
logy the years 375-371 were suppo;375;bc-y;;;;
the years 375-371 were supposed ;371;bc-y;;;;
affairs after 377 is therefore d;377;bc-y;;;;
t of the years 376-367 on interna;376;bc-y;;;;
the years 376-367 on internal po;367;bc-y;;;;
he decision in 367 to replace the;367;bc-y;;;;
writes that in 370 the Velitraean;370;bc-y;;;;
man success in 367.[72] According;367;bc-y;;;;
fifth time in 367, without a str;367;bc-y;;;;
avaged Rome in 365.\n\nModern inter;365;bc-y;;;;
and Rome until 357.[74]\n\nSporadic;357;bc-y;;;;
with Privernum 358–357\nIn 358 the;358;bc-y;;1.1.2.1;;
Privernum 358–357\nIn 358 the Rom;357;bc-y;;;;
num 358–357\nIn 358 the Romans for;358;bc-y;;1.1.2.2;;
the consuls of 357, Gaius Marcius;357;bc-y;;;;
writes that in 353 the Latins rep;353;bc-y;;;;
account of the 350s suggest that t;350s;bc-d;;;;
on of Satricum 346\nLivy states th;346;bc-y;;;;
lt Satricum in 348.[83] Then in 3;348;bc-y;;;;
8.[83] Then in 346 news reached R;346;bc-y;;;;
of Satricum in 377 and 346, both ;377;bc-y;;;;
cum in 377 and 346, both times on;346;bc-y;;;;
rebuilding in 348 is more likely;348;bc-y;;;;
after the mid-fourth century.[87] H;fourth;bc-c;;;;
ptured both in 377 and 346.[86] T;377;bc-y;;;;
oth in 377 and 346.[86] The claim;346;bc-y;;;;
apture of Sora 345\nLivy notes tha;345;bc-y;;;;
the consuls of 345 took Sora, loc;345;bc-y;;;;
the Romans in 315. It is however;315;bc-y;;;;
l of Sora from 345 to 315. The ne;345;bc-y;;;;
ra from 345 to 315. The next reco;315;bc-y;;;;
took place in 329.[90]\n\nWars wit;329;bc-y;;;;
num and Antium 341\nIn 343 the Fir;341;bc-y;;;;
Antium 341\nIn 343 the First Samn;343;bc-y;;;;
ampania and in 342 Rome were, acc;342;bc-y;;;;
he consuls for 341, Gaius Plautiu;341;bc-y;;;;
rded again for 329 when Lucius Ae;329;bc-y;;;;
red the war of 341 an unhistorica;341;bc-y;;;;
ate of that of 329. A supporting ;329;bc-y;;;;
the census of 318 rather than in;318;bc-y;;;;
the census of 332. It is however;332;bc-y;;;;
gainst Rome in 341.[93]\n\nRoman su;341;bc-y;;;;
the Latin War, 340–338, but Rome ;340;bc-y;;;;
Latin War, 340–338, but Rome was ;338;bc-y;;;;
Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). New Y;1000;bc-i;;;;
</nowiki></poem>
[[Category:Pages with dates]]
[[Category:en.wikipedia.org]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 1 October 2023
Line 37:		Line 37:
	oman defeat in 379, is a common t;379;bc-y;;;;		oman defeat in 379, is a common t;379;bc-y;;;;
	eatment of the 378 campaign sugge;378;bc-y;;;;		eatment of the 378 campaign sugge;378;bc-y;;;;
	an wars of the 5th ~~century~~, ~~Ecetr~~;5th;bc-c;;;;		an wars of the 5th c@entury, Ecet;5th;bc-c;;;;
	ter Matuta, in 346, this time by ;346;bc-y;;;;		ter Matuta, in 346, this time by ;346;bc-y;;;;
	of Satricum in 377 and 346 is a d;377;bc-y;;;;		of Satricum in 377 and 346 is a d;377;bc-y;;;;
Line 71:		Line 71:
	cum in 377 and 346, both times on;346;bc-y;;;;		cum in 377 and 346, both times on;346;bc-y;;;;
	rebuilding in 348 is more likely;348;bc-y;;;;		rebuilding in 348 is more likely;348;bc-y;;;;
	after the mid-fourth ~~century~~.[00] H;fourth;bc-c;;;;		after the mid-fourth c@entury.[00] ;fourth;bc-c;;;;
	ptured both in 377 and 346.[00] T;377;bc-y;;;;		ptured both in 377 and 346.[00] T;377;bc-y;;;;
	oth in 377 and 346.[00] The claim;346;bc-y;;;;		oth in 377 and 346.[00] The claim;346;bc-y;;;;
Line 87:		Line 87:
	red the war of 341 an unhistorica;341;bc-y;;;;		red the war of 341 an unhistorica;341;bc-y;;;;
	ate of that of 329. A supporting ;329;bc-y;;;;		ate of that of 329. A supporting ;329;bc-y;;;;
	the ~~census~~ of 318 rather than in;318;bc-y;;;;		the c@ensus of 318 rather than in;318;bc-y;;;;
	the ~~census~~ of 332. It is however;332;bc-y;;;;		the c@ensus of 332. It is however;332;bc-y;;;;
	gainst Rome in 341.[00]\n\nRoman su;341;bc-y;;;;		gainst Rome in 341.[00]\n\nRoman su;341;bc-y;;;;
	the Latin War, 340–338, but Rome ;340;bc-y;;;;		the Latin War, 340–338, but Rome ;340;bc-y;;;;